Michael Mann takes on his arch-enemies, dissenting scientists and loyal opposition at Committee Hearings.

Frankly, it would take too much time to recount all of Michael Mann's enemies, although I can mention a partial list: Dr. Judith Curry, Koch Brothers, Patrick Taylor, Dr. John Christy, Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr, Myron Ebell, Tucker Carlson, Joe Barton, Washington Times, Steve Milloy, Daily Caller, Chris Horner, David Schnare, Craig Richardson, Hal Doirin, Ross McKitrick, [...]

By |2017-04-03T22:53:34-05:00March 30th, 2017|Categories: Environment, Thought Piece|Tags: , |Comments Off on Michael Mann takes on his arch-enemies, dissenting scientists and loyal opposition at Committee Hearings.

If the Science is settled, why did Dr. John Bates’​ piece evoke 509 comments in the last few days about NOAA’s Karl Study of 2015?

Thought Piece In an effort to be balanced on the super-storm of debate caused by yesterday's expose in the London Mail written by David Rose, I have reprinted Dr. John Bates' original article, published on February 4, 2017, which a day earlier than the Mail piece. The myriad of points of view and points of fact (509 [...]

By |2017-04-03T22:50:23-05:00February 6th, 2017|Categories: Energy, Thought Piece|Tags: , , |Comments Off on If the Science is settled, why did Dr. John Bates’​ piece evoke 509 comments in the last few days about NOAA’s Karl Study of 2015?

If the Science is settled, why did Dr. John Bates’​ piece evoke 509 comments in the last few days about NOAA’s Karl Study of 2015?

Thought Piece Fake News or Not: To date, none of the major media or climate "news" sites have mentioned this London Mail challenge to the global warming data. The next few days will tell us much about the US scientific community and academia. If this Mail is "fake news," then it deserves to be exposed, just as [...]

By |2017-04-03T22:50:23-05:00February 6th, 2017|Categories: Energy, Thought Piece|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on If the Science is settled, why did Dr. John Bates’​ piece evoke 509 comments in the last few days about NOAA’s Karl Study of 2015?

“New York Times: Our Readers Are Too Dumb To Understand Global Warming Numbers”​ My Kingdom for a Single Good Science Journalist!

Thought Piece Below is the written dialogue between Robert Tracinski of the Federalist and Justin Gillis of the New York Times. No author of surrealistic fiction could have done better. New York Times: Our Readers Are Too Dumb To Understand Global Warming Numbers “When I challenged him about the 'hottest year on record,' a New York [...]

By |2017-04-03T22:50:54-05:00February 1st, 2017|Categories: Energy, Thought Piece|Tags: , , |Comments Off on “New York Times: Our Readers Are Too Dumb To Understand Global Warming Numbers”​ My Kingdom for a Single Good Science Journalist!

Climate change: Fresh doubt over global warming ‘pause’: One-sided “reporting” isn’t a global warming report, at all.

Thought Piece They see black and white and I see red. It is hard not to notice the obvious bias of the BBC writer. How can there be any real debate about "global warming" or its Siamese twin, "climate change." In fact, this "report" may be an example of funding bias. First, I confess to being a [...]

By |2017-04-03T22:53:36-05:00January 5th, 2017|Categories: Energy, Environment, Thought Piece|Tags: , , , |1 Comment